Functions like isMinGW() and isGnuLibC() have a good reason to exist: They look
at multiple components of the target. But functions like isWasm(), isDarwin(),
isGnu(), etc only exist to save 4-8 characters. I don't think this is a good
enough reason to keep them, especially given that:
* It's not immediately obvious to a reader whether target.isDarwin() means the
same thing as target.os.tag.isDarwin() precisely because isMinGW() and similar
functions *do* look at multiple components.
* It's not clear where we would draw the line. The logical conclusion before
this commit would be to also wrap Arch.isX86(), Os.Tag.isSolarish(),
Abi.isOpenHarmony(), etc... this obviously quickly gets out of hand.
* It's nice to just have a single correct way of doing something.
This will mainly be used when targeting our wasm2c implementation which has no
problem with zero-length bulk memory operations, as a non-standard extension.
See: https://github.com/WebAssembly/tool-conventions/pull/235
This is not *quite* using the same features as the spec'd lime1 model because
LLVM 19 doesn't have the level of feature granularity that we need for that.
This will be fixed once we upgrade to LLVM 20.
Part of #21818.
To my knowledge there isn't an implementation of `sse4.2` that doesn't have `crc32`.
The Clang driver also sets `crc32` to be implicitly enabled when an explicit `-crc32`
wasn't provided. This matches that behaviour.
We need this behaviour to compile libraries like `rocksdb` which currently guard against
`crc32` intrinsics by checking for `sse4.2`.
This is necessary since isGnuLibC() is true for hurd, so we need to be able to
represent a glibc version for it.
Also add an Os.TaggedVersionRange.gnuLibCVersion() convenience function.
Like d1d95294fd657f771657ea671a6984b860347fb0, this is more Apple nonsense where
they abused the arch component of the triple to encode what's really an ABI.
Handling this correctly in Zig's target triple model would take quite a bit of
work. Fortunately, the last Armv7-based Apple Watch was released in 2017 and
these targets are now considered legacy. By the time Zig hits 1.0, they will be
a distant memory. So just remove them.
* Adds new cpu architectures propeller1 and propeller2.
These cpu architectures allow targeting the Parallax Propeller 1 and Propeller 2, which are both very special microcontrollers with 512 registers and 8 cpu cores.
Resolves#21559
* Adds std.elf.EM.PROPELLER and std.elf.EM.PROPELLER2
* Fixes missing switch prongs in src/codegen/llvm.zig
* Fixes order in std.Target.Arch
---------
Co-authored-by: Felix "xq" Queißner <git@random-projects.net>
At bare minimum, the compiler expects std.Target.<arch>.cpu.generic to work for
any given architecture when generating the builtin module. So rather than try to
hack that into working when the affected modules are omitted, just actually keep
them.
This affected lanai and xcore.
Abi.android on its own is not enough to know whether soft float or hard float
should be used. In the C world, androideabi is typically used for the soft float
case, so let's go with that.
Note that Android doesn't have a hard float ABI, so no androideabihf.
Closes#21488.
The compiler actually doesn't need any functional changes for this: Sema
does reification based on the tag indices of `std.builtin.Type` already!
So, no zig1.wasm update is necessary.
This change is necessary to disallow name clashes between fields and
decls on a type, which is a prerequisite of #9938.
* some manual fixes to generated CPU features code. In the future it
would be nice to make the script do those automatically.
* add to various target OS switches. Some of the values I was unsure of
and added TODO panics, for example in the case of spirv CPU arch.
This is a partial revert of 105db13536b4dc2affe130cb8d2eee6c97c89bcd.
As we learned from Void Linux packaging, these options are not actually
helpful since the distribution package manager may very well want to
cross-compile the packages that it is building.
So, let's not overcomplicate things. There are already the standard
options: -Dtarget, -Dcpu, and -Ddynamic-linker.
These options are generally provided when the project generates machine
code artifacts, however, there may be a project that does no such thing,
in which case it makes sense for these options to be missing. The Zig
Build System is a general-purpose build system, after all.
