Rename all references of sparcv9 to sparc64, to make Zig align more with
other projects. Also, added new function to convert glibc arch name to Zig
arch name, since it refers to the architecture as sparcv9.
This is based on the suggestion by @kubkon in PR 11847.
(https://github.com/ziglang/zig/pull/11487#pullrequestreview-963761757)
When handling the `negate` ZIR instruction, Zig now checks for a
comptime operand and handles it as a special case rather than lowering
it as `0 - x` so that the expression `-x` where `x` is a floating point
value known at compile-time, will get the negative zero bitwise
representation.
This improves the ABI alignment resolution code.
This commit fully enables the MachO linker code in stage3. Note,
however, that there are still miscompilations in stage3.
This prevents a nasty type of bugs where we accidentally unfreeze
a register that was frozen purposely in the outer scope, risking
accidental realloc of a taken register.
Fix CF flags spilling on aarch64 backend.
If the hw doesn't have support for exotic floating-point types such
as `f80`, we lower the call to a compiler-rt function call instead.
I've added a behavior test specifically targeting this use case which
now passes on `aarch64-macos`.
Additionally, this commit makes it possible to successfully build
stage3 on `aarch64-macos`. We can print the compiler's help message,
however, building with it needs a little bit more love still.
So far it's supported by the LLVM backend only. I recommend for the
other backends to wait for the resolution of #10761 before adding
support for this feature.
These targets now have a similar disagreement with LLVM about the
alignment of 128-bit integers as x86_64:
* riscv64
* powerpc64
* powerpc64le
* mips64
* mips64el
* sparcv9
See #2987
For x86_64, LLVMABIAlignmentOfType(i128) reports 8. However I think 16
is a better number for two reasons:
1. Better machine code when loading into SIMD register.
2. The C ABI wants 16 for extern structs.
ZIR instructions updated: atomic_load, atomic_rmw, atomic_store, cmpxchg
These no longer construct a pointer type as the result location. This
solves a TODO that was preventing the pointer from possibly being
volatile, as well as properly handling allowzero and addrspace.
It also allows the pointer to be over-aligned, which may be needed
depending on the target. As a consequence, the element type needs to be
communicated in the ZIR. This is done by strategically making one of the
operands be ResultLoc.ty instead of ResultLoc.coerced_ty if possible, or
otherwise explicitly adding elem_type into the ZIR encoding, such as in
the case of atomic_load.
The pointer type of atomic operations is now checked in Sema by coercing
it to an expected pointer type, that maybe over-aligned according to
target requirements.
Together with the previous commit, Zig now has smaller alignment for
large integers, depending on the target, and yet still has type safety
for atomic operations that specially require higher alignment.
Prior to this commit, the logic for ABI size and ABI alignment for
integers was naive and incorrect. This results in wasted hardware as
well as undefined behavior in the LLVM backend when we memset an
incorrect number of bytes to 0xaa due to disagreeing with LLVM about the
ABI size of integers.
This commit introduces a "max int align" value which is different per
Target. This value is used to derive the ABI size and alignment of all
integers.
This commit makes an interesting change from stage1, which treats
128-bit integers as 16-bytes aligned for x86_64-linux. stage1 is
incorrect. The maximum integer alignment on this system is only 8 bytes.
This change breaks the behavior test called "128-bit cmpxchg" because on
that target, 128-bit cmpxchg does require a 16-bytes aligned pointer to
a 128 bit integer. However, this alignment property does not belong on
*all* 128 bit integers - only on the pointer type in the `@cmpxchg`
builtin function prototype. The user can then use an alignment override
annotation on a 128-bit integer variable or struct field to obtain such
a pointer.
Just like for Struct in 8238d4b33585a715c58ab559cd001dd3ea1db55b, in the
case of ErrorUnion struct we need to return a compound literal "(T){...}"
instead of just "{}", which is invalid code when used in e.g. a "return"
expression.
* Sema: Correctly determine whether array_cat lhs and rhs are single ptrs
Many-pointers are also not single-pointers and wouldn't be considered
here. This commit makes the conditions use the appropriately-named
isSinglePointer instead.
* Sema: Correctly obtain ArrayInfo for many-pointer concatenation
Many-pointers at comptime have a known size like slices and can be used
in array concatenation. This fixes a stage1 regression.
* test: Add comptime manyptr concatenation test
Co-authored-by: sin-ack <sin-ack@users.noreply.github.com>
