- Rename GPU address spaces to match with SPIR-V spec.
- Emit `Block` Decoration for Uniform/PushConstant variables.
- Don't emit `OpTypeForwardPointer` for non-opencl targets.
(there's still a false-positive about recursive structs)
Signed-off-by: Ali Cheraghi <alichraghi@proton.me>
This commit reworks how anonymous struct literals and tuples work.
Previously, an untyped anonymous struct literal
(e.g. `const x = .{ .a = 123 }`) was given an "anonymous struct type",
which is a special kind of struct which coerces using structural
equivalence. This mechanism was a holdover from before we used
RLS / result types as the primary mechanism of type inference. This
commit changes the language so that the type assigned here is a "normal"
struct type. It uses a form of equivalence based on the AST node and the
type's structure, much like a reified (`@Type`) type.
Additionally, tuples have been simplified. The distinction between
"simple" and "complex" tuple types is eliminated. All tuples, even those
explicitly declared using `struct { ... }` syntax, use structural
equivalence, and do not undergo staged type resolution. Tuples are very
restricted: they cannot have non-`auto` layouts, cannot have aligned
fields, and cannot have default values with the exception of `comptime`
fields. Tuples currently do not have optimized layout, but this can be
changed in the future.
This change simplifies the language, and fixes some problematic
coercions through pointers which led to unintuitive behavior.
Resolves: #16865
LLVM recently introduced new Triple::ArchType members in 19.1.3 which broke our
static assertions in zig_llvm.cpp. When implementing a fix for that, I realized
that we don't even need a lot of the stuff we have in zig_llvm.(cpp,h) anymore.
This commit trims the interface down considerably.
There are several more that we could support here, but I didn't feel
like going down the rabbit-hole of figuring them out. In particular,
some of the Clang enum fields aren't specific enough for us, so we'll
have to switch on the target to figure out how to translate-c them. That
can be a future enhancement.
The old `CallingConvention` type is replaced with the new
`NewCallingConvention`. References to `NewCallingConvention` in the
compiler are updated accordingly. In addition, a few parts of the
standard library are updated to use the new type correctly.
This commit begins implementing accepted proposal #21209 by making
`std.builtin.CallingConvention` a tagged union.
The stage1 dance here is a little convoluted. This commit introduces the
new type as `NewCallingConvention`, keeping the old `CallingConvention`
around. The compiler uses `std.builtin.NewCallingConvention`
exclusively, but when fetching the type from `std` when running the
compiler (e.g. with `getBuiltinType`), the name `CallingConvention` is
used. This allows a prior build of Zig to be used to build this commit.
The next commit will update `zig1.wasm`, and then the compiler and
standard library can be updated to completely replace
`CallingConvention` with `NewCallingConvention`.
The second half of #21209 is to remove `@setAlignStack`, which will be
implemented in another commit after updating `zig1.wasm`.
* Adds new cpu architectures propeller1 and propeller2.
These cpu architectures allow targeting the Parallax Propeller 1 and Propeller 2, which are both very special microcontrollers with 512 registers and 8 cpu cores.
Resolves#21559
* Adds std.elf.EM.PROPELLER and std.elf.EM.PROPELLER2
* Fixes missing switch prongs in src/codegen/llvm.zig
* Fixes order in std.Target.Arch
---------
Co-authored-by: Felix "xq" Queißner <git@random-projects.net>
In theory, this should work for v68+. In practice, it runs into an LLVM
assertion when using a `freeze` instruction on `f16` values, similar to the
issue we had for LoongArch.
Abi.android on its own is not enough to know whether soft float or hard float
should be used. In the C world, androideabi is typically used for the soft float
case, so let's go with that.
Note that Android doesn't have a hard float ABI, so no androideabihf.
Closes#21488.
See: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/directx/directx-adopting-spir-v
Since we never hooked up the (experimental) DirectX LLVM backend, we've never
actually supported targeting DXIL in Zig. With Microsoft moving away from DXIL,
that seems very unlikely to change.
