I only wanted to fix a bug originally, but this logic was kind of a
rat's nest. But now... okay, it still *is*, but it's now a slightly more
navigable nest, with cute little signs occasionally, painted by adorable
rats desparately trying to follow the specification.
Hopefully #3806 comes along at some point to simplify this logic a
little.
Resolves: #23139
This code applies to ~any POSIX OS where we don't link libc. For example, it'll
be useful for FreeBSD and NetBSD.
As part of this, move std.os.linux.pie to std.pie since there's really nothing
Linux-specific about what that file is doing.
Evaluate all child processes in the temporary directory, and use
`std.fs.path.relative` to make every other path relative to that child
cwd instead of our cwd.
Resolves: #22119
It's incorrect to ever set `include_reference_trace` here, because the
compiler has already given or not given reference traces depending on
the `-freference-trace` option propagated to the compiler process by
`std.Build.Step.Compile`.
Perhaps in future we could make the compiler always return the reference
trace when communicating over the compiler protocol; that'd be more
versatile than the current behavior, because the build runner could, for
instance, show a reference trace on-demand without having to even invoke
the compiler. That seems really useful, since the reference trace is
*often* unnecessary noise, but *sometimes* essential. However, we don't
live in that world right now, so passing the option here doesn't make
sense.
Resolves: #23415
To an average user, it may be unclear why these notes are not just in
the reference trace; that's because they are more important, because
they are inline calls through which comptime values may propagate. There
are now 3 possible wordings for this note:
* "called at comptime here"
* "called inline here"
* "generic function instantiated here"
An alternative could be these wordings:
* "while analyzing comptime call here"
* "while analyzing inline call here"
* "while analyzing generic instantiation here"
I'm not sure which is better -- but this commit is certainly better than
status quo.
Inline calls which happened in the erroring `AnalUnit` still show as
error notes, because they tend to make very important context (e.g. to
see how comptime values propagate through them). However, "earlier"
inline calls are still useful to see to understand how something is
being referenced, so we should include them in the reference trace.
When `-freference-trace` is not passed, we want to show exactly one
reference trace. Previously, we set the reference trace root in `Sema`
iff there were no other failed analyses. However, this results in an
arbitrary error being the one with the reference trace after error
sorting. It is also incompatible with incremental compilation, where
some errors might be unreferenced. Instead, set the field on all
analysis errors, and decide in `Compilation.getAllErrorsAlloc` which
reference trace[s] to actually show.
Error messages never contain periods or grave accents.
Get rid of the periods and use apostrophes instead in
probably the only two error messages that had them.
* ucontext_t ptr is 8-byte aligned instead of 16-byte aligned which @alignCast() expects
* Retrieve pc address from ucontext_t since unwind_state is null
* Work around __mcontext_data being written incorrectly by the kernel
