On platforms where c_longdouble is 128-bits, interop with C code
is simplified by making f128 match the alignment of c_longdouble.
I intended to make this change as part of #13257, but I missed this
part.
Can be changed to `!inst_ty.hisRuntimeBitsIgnoreComptime()` when the
"result location with inferred type ends up being pointer to comptime_int"
test stops producing Air containing a `bitcast(*comptime_int, ...)`.
See #13410
Rewrite GHASH to use 128-bit multiplication over non-reversed
integers, and up to 8 blocks aggregated reduction.
lib/std/crypto/benchmark.zig results:
Xeon E5:
Before: 1604 MiB/s
After: 4005 MiB/s
Apple M1:
Before: 2769 MiB/s
After: 6014 MiB/s
This also makes AES-GCM faster by the way.
When Wasm extern functions contain the same name, but have a
different module name such as `extern "a"` vs `extern "b"` LLVM will
currently resolve the two functions to the same symbol. By mangling
the name of the symbol, we ensure the functions are resolved
seperately. We mangle the name by applying <name>|<module> where
module is also known as the library name.
When a number of bytes to be allocated is so great that alignForward()
is not possible, return `error.OutOfMemory`.
Companion commit to 3f3003097cbf5a6ad9e0dfc29b2cafbe2e35dded.
This reverts commit 06310e3d4eb47fed88b175891cb5865bb050f020, reapplying
commit a430630002bf02162ccbf8d3eb10fd73e490cefd.
I deeply apologize to @moosichu and those affected by this bug. The
original fix was actually fine. When I reverted it, I misremembered
how the Cache API works. I thought the fix was going to introduce
nondeterminism into the hash, but I forgot that the order of files in
the manifest doesn't actually matter when checking for a cache hit.
Actually, it does matter a little bit. This fix has a subtle downside
which is that it does introduce the possibility of false negatives when
checking for cache hits of 2+ iterations ago. For example, if the code
goes from "foo", to "bar", and then back to "foo", it may look like a
cache miss when it should have been a hit because 2 iterations ago the
code was the same. However, this is an uncommon use case, and all it
does is cause a bit of wasted time and disk space. That said, my
suggestion from earlier still applies and would be a nice follow-up
enhancement to this fix:
The proper solution to this is to, in whole cache mode, append the hash
inputs to some data structure, and then after the compilation is
complete, do some kind of sorting on the hash inputs so that they will
be the same order every time, then apply them in sequence. No lock on
the Cache object is needed for this scheme.
closes#11063
Instead of making the memory alignment functions more complicated, I
added more API documentation for their existing semantics.
closes#12118closes#12135
Previously, if you used `zig test -ofmt=c -target foobar` then Zig would
try to compile the generated C code with the native target instead of
"foobar".
With this change, `--test-cmd` with e.g. QEMU still won't work, but at
least the binary will get compiled for the correct target.
