/home/alexrp/.cache/zig/b/18236e302af25e3fb99bc6a232ddc447/builtin.zig:6:5: error: TODO (SPIR-V): Implement unsigned composite int type of 64 bits
pub const zig_backend = std.builtin.CompilerBackend.stage2_spirv64;
~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These cases have been disabled for a while, and we have transitioned to
using a compact file format for incremental test cases.
I was originally planning to port all of these cases, but the vast
majority aren't testing anything interesting, so it wasn't worth the
effort. I did look through each one; anything interesting being tested
has been extracted into a new case in `test/incremental/`.
Two of the new tests are currently failing with the self-hosted ELF
linker, and thus are currently only enabled with the C backend.
Resolves: #12844
This commit reworks how anonymous struct literals and tuples work.
Previously, an untyped anonymous struct literal
(e.g. `const x = .{ .a = 123 }`) was given an "anonymous struct type",
which is a special kind of struct which coerces using structural
equivalence. This mechanism was a holdover from before we used
RLS / result types as the primary mechanism of type inference. This
commit changes the language so that the type assigned here is a "normal"
struct type. It uses a form of equivalence based on the AST node and the
type's structure, much like a reified (`@Type`) type.
Additionally, tuples have been simplified. The distinction between
"simple" and "complex" tuple types is eliminated. All tuples, even those
explicitly declared using `struct { ... }` syntax, use structural
equivalence, and do not undergo staged type resolution. Tuples are very
restricted: they cannot have non-`auto` layouts, cannot have aligned
fields, and cannot have default values with the exception of `comptime`
fields. Tuples currently do not have optimized layout, but this can be
changed in the future.
This change simplifies the language, and fixes some problematic
coercions through pointers which led to unintuitive behavior.
Resolves: #16865
Also, start using labeled switch statements when dispatching
maybe-runtime instructions like condbr to comptime-only variants like
condbr_inline.
This can't be merged until we get a zig1.wasm update due to #21385.
Resolves: #21405
The print order of error sets depends on the order that the compiler
adds names to its internal state. These names can be anything, and
do not necessarily need to be from the same error set or be errors
at all. When the last remaining reference to builtin.cpu.arch was
removed in start.zig in 9b42bc1ce5, this order changed. Likely there
is something that has the name 'C' that is referenced somewhere
recursively from builtin.cpu.arch.
This all causes these few tests to fail, and hence the expected
order is simply updated now. Perhaps there is a better way to
add this.
Under some architecture/operating system combinations it is forbidden
to return a pointer from a merge, as these pointers must point to a
location at compile time. This adds a check for those cases when
returning a pointer from a block merge.
This experimental target has no recent active maintainer. It's the only
linker backend complaining about this branch and I can't make sense of
the stack trace.
This can be fixed asynchronously by anyone who wants to maintain plan9
support. It does not need to block this branch.
although they would also pass simply reverted to master branch because
I made the deprecated API still work for now (to be removed after 0.14.0
is tagged)
The compiler actually doesn't need any functional changes for this: Sema
does reification based on the tag indices of `std.builtin.Type` already!
So, no zig1.wasm update is necessary.
This change is necessary to disallow name clashes between fields and
decls on a type, which is a prerequisite of #9938.
Pointer subtraction on `void *` or function pointers is UB by the C
spec, but is permitted by GCC and Clang as an extension. So, avoid
crashing translate-c in such cases, and follow the extension behavior --
there's nothing else that could really be intended.
