Achieve this by reducing the amount of special casing to handle EOF so
that the already correct logic for normal comments does not need to be
duplicated.
After #35 is implemented,
we should be able to recover from this *at any indentation level*,
reporting a parse error and yet also parsing all the decls even
inside structs. Until then, I don't want to add any hacks to make
this work.
I don't understand the idea here of this kind of recovery. If we
want to resurrect this test case we need some comments on it to explain
the purpose, example use cases, expected behavior, etc.
If the type is a reference to a global declaration that has not yet
been translated we need to use the global scope for translation
so that other functions can also reference it.
All stage2 tests are passing again in this branch.
Remaining checklist for this branch:
* get the rest of the zig fmt test cases passing
- re-enable the translate-c test case that is blocking on this
* implement the 2 `@panic(TODO)`'s in parse.zig
* use fn_proto not fn_decl for extern function declarations
Allowing same line doc comments causes some ambiguity as to how
generated docs should represent the case in which both same line
and preceding line doc comments are present:
/// preceding line
const foobar = 42; /// same line
Furthermore disallowing these makes things simpler as there is now only
one way to add a doc comment to a decl or struct field.
Now it builds and what remains in this branch is:
* fix the stage2 compiler regressions from this branch
* finish the rest of zig fmt test cases, get them passing
* Merge in Vexu's translate-c AST branch & fix translate-c regressions
The previous iteration of translate-c used an incorrect block label
in the break statement for a translated C statement expression. This adds
a test to ensure the correct label is used in the new intermediate AST
version of translate-c.
Using this in its current state would be a bug as it could cause line
comments to be deleted or a `// zig fmt: (on|off)` directive to be
missed.
Removing it doesn't currently cause any test failures, if a reason for
its continued existence is discovered in the future another solution
will have to be found.
