This is a bit harder than it seems at first glance. Actually resolving the type is the easy part: the interesting thing is actually getting the capture value. We split this into three cases: * If all payload types are the same (as is required in status quo), we can just do what we already do: get the first field value. * If all payloads are in-memory coercible to the resolved type, we still fetch the first field, but we also emit a `bitcast` to convert to the resolved type. * Otherwise, we need to handle each case separately. We emit a nested `switch_br` which, for each possible case, gets the corresponding union field, and coerces it to the resolved type. As an optimization, the inner switch's 'else' prong is used for any peer which is in-memory coercible to the target type, and the bitcast approach described above is used. Pointer captures have the additional constraint that all payload types must be in-memory coercible to the resolved type. Resolves: #2812
Test Case Quick Reference
Use comments at the end of the file to indicate metadata about the test case. Here are examples of different kinds of tests:
Compile Error Test
If you want it to be run with zig test and match expected error messages:
// error
// is_test=1
//
// :4:13: error: 'try' outside function scope
Execution
This will do zig run on the code and expect exit code 0.
// run
Incremental Compilation
Make multiple files that have ".", and then an integer, before the ".zig" extension, like this:
hello.0.zig
hello.1.zig
hello.2.zig
Each file can be a different kind of test, such as expecting compile errors, or expecting to be run and exit(0). The test harness will use these to simulate incremental compilation.
At the time of writing there is no way to specify multiple files being changed as part of an update.
Subdirectories
Subdirectories do not have any semantic meaning but they can be used for organization since the test harness will recurse into them. The full directory path will be prepended as a prefix on the test case name.
Limiting which Backends and Targets are Tested
// run
// backend=stage2,llvm
// target=x86_64-linux,x86_64-macos
Possible backends are:
stage1: equivalent to-fstage1.stage2: equivalent to passing-fno-stage1 -fno-LLVM.llvm: equivalent to-fLLVM -fno-stage1.