mlugg e9bd2d45d4
Sema: rewrite semantic analysis of function calls
This rewrite improves some error messages, hugely simplifies the logic,
and fixes several bugs. One of these bugs is technically a new rule
which Andrew and I agreed on: if a parameter has a comptime-only type
but is not declared `comptime`, then the corresponding call argument
should not be *evaluated* at comptime; only resolved. Implementing this
required changing how function types work a little, which in turn
required allowing a new kind of function coercion for some generic use
cases: function coercions are now allowed to implicitly *remove*
`comptime` annotations from parameters with comptime-only types. This is
okay because removing the annotation affects only the call site.

Resolves: #22262
2025-01-09 06:46:47 +00:00
..
2024-09-26 21:02:14 -07:00

Test Case Quick Reference

Use comments at the end of the file to indicate metadata about the test case. Here are examples of different kinds of tests:

Compile Error Test

If you want it to be run with zig test and match expected error messages:

// error
// is_test=true
//
// :4:13: error: 'try' outside function scope

Execution

This will do zig run on the code and expect exit code 0.

// run

Translate-c

If you want to test translating C code to Zig use translate-c:

// translate-c
// c_frontend=aro,clang
// target=x86_64-linux
//
// pub const foo = 1;
// pub const immediately_after_foo = 2;
//
// pub const somewhere_else_in_the_file = 3:

Run Translated C

If you want to test translating C code to Zig and then executing it use run-translated-c:

// run-translated-c
// c_frontend=aro,clang
// target=x86_64-linux
//
// Hello world!

Incremental Compilation

Make multiple files that have ".", and then an integer, before the ".zig" extension, like this:

hello.0.zig
hello.1.zig
hello.2.zig

Each file can be a different kind of test, such as expecting compile errors, or expecting to be run and exit(0). The test harness will use these to simulate incremental compilation.

At the time of writing there is no way to specify multiple files being changed as part of an update.

Subdirectories

Subdirectories do not have any semantic meaning but they can be used for organization since the test harness will recurse into them. The full directory path will be prepended as a prefix on the test case name.

Limiting which Backends and Targets are Tested

// run
// backend=stage2,llvm
// target=x86_64-linux,x86_64-macos

Possible backends are:

  • stage1: equivalent to -fstage1.
  • stage2: equivalent to passing -fno-stage1 -fno-LLVM.
  • llvm: equivalent to -fLLVM -fno-stage1.