Well, this was a journey!
The original issue I was trying to fix is covered by the new behavior
test in array.zig: in essence, `ty` and `coerced_ty` result locations
were not correctly propagated.
While fixing this, I noticed a similar bug in struct inits: the type was
propagated to *fields* fine, but the actual struct init was
unnecessarily anonymous, which could lead to unnecessary copies. Note
that the behavior test added in struct.zig was already passing - the bug
here didn't change any easy-to-test behavior - but I figured I'd add it
anyway.
This is a little harder than it seems, because the result type may not
itself be an array/struct type: it could be an optional / error union
wrapper. A new ZIR instruction is introduced to unwrap these.
This is also made a little tricky by the fact that it's possible for
result types to be unknown at the time of semantic analysis (due to
`anytype` parameters), leading to generic poison. In these cases, we
must essentially downgrade to an anonymous initialization.
Fixing these issues exposed *another* bug, related to type resolution in
Sema. That issue is now tracked by #16603. As a temporary workaround for
this bug, a few result locations for builtin function operands have been
disabled in AstGen. This is technically a breaking change, but it's very
minor: I doubt it'll cause any breakage in the wild.
Most of this migration was performed automatically with `zig fmt`. There
were a few exceptions which I had to manually fix:
* `@alignCast` and `@addrSpaceCast` cannot be automatically rewritten
* `@truncate`'s fixup is incorrect for vectors
* Test cases are not formatted, and their error locations change
Now they use slices or array pointers with any element type instead of
requiring byte pointers.
This is a breaking enhancement to the language.
The safety check for overlapping pointers will be implemented in a
future commit.
closes#14040
Normally when we want a pointer to the end of a struct we just add 1 to
the struct pointer. However, when it is a zero-bit struct, the pointer
type being used during lowering is often a dummy pointer type that
actually points to a non-zero-bit type, so we actually want to add 0
instead, since a zero-bit struct begins and ends at the same address.
* Handle a `null` return from `llvmFieldIndex`.
* Add a behavior test to test this code path.
* Reword this test name, which incorrectly described how pointers to
zero-bit fields behave, and instead describe the actual test.
