`std.Io.tty.Config.detect` may be an expensive check (e.g. involving
syscalls), and doing it every time we need to print isn't really
necessary; under normal usage, we can compute the value once and cache
it for the whole program's execution. Since anyone outputting to stderr
may reasonably want this information (in fact they are very likely to),
it makes sense to cache it and return it from `lockStderrWriter`. Call
sites who do not need it will experience no significant overhead, and
can just ignore the TTY config with a `const w, _` destructure.
As with Solaris (dba1bf935390ddb0184a4dc72245454de6c06fd2), we have no way to
actually audit contributions for these OSs. IBM also makes it even harder than
Oracle to actually obtain these OSs.
closes#23695closes#23694closes#3655closes#23693
The compiler crashed when we tried to call a function pointer for which
the type signature does not match any function body or function import
in the entire wasm executable, because there is no way to create a
reference to a function without it being in the function table or import
table. Solution is to make this instruction lower to unreachable.
There is no straightforward way for the Zig team to access the Solaris system
headers; to do this, one has to create an Oracle account, accept their EULA to
download the installer ISO, and finally install it on a machine or VM. We do not
have to jump through hoops like this for any other OS that we support, and no
one on the team has expressed willingness to do it.
As a result, we cannot audit any Solaris contributions to std.c or other
similarly sensitive parts of the standard library. The best we would be able to
do is assume that Solaris and illumos are 100% compatible with no way to verify
that assumption. But at that point, the solaris and illumos OS tags would be
functionally identical anyway.
For Solaris especially, any contributions that involve APIs introduced after the
OS was made closed-source would also be inherently more risky than equivalent
contributions for other proprietary OSs due to the case of Google LLC v. Oracle
America, Inc., wherein Oracle clearly demonstrated its willingness to pursue
legal action against entities that merely copy API declarations.
Finally, Oracle laid off most of the Solaris team in 2017; the OS has been in
maintenance mode since, presumably to be retired completely sometime in the 2030s.
For these reasons, this commit removes all Oracle Solaris support.
Anyone who still wishes to use Zig on Solaris can try their luck by simply using
illumos instead of solaris in target triples - chances are it'll work. But there
will be no effort from the Zig team to support this use case; we recommend that
people move to illumos instead.
Zig uses "rN" for MIPS register clobbers which are more
ergonomic and easier to write (.rN vs. .@"$N").
However, GCC and Clang uses "$N".
Bug: #25613
Signed-off-by: Bingwu Zhang <xtex@xtexx.eu.org>
For the supported COFF machine types of X64 (x86_64), I386 (x86), ARMNT (thumb), and ARM64 (aarch64), this new Zig implementation results in byte-for-byte identical .lib files when compared to the previous LLVM-backed implementation.
The memory operand might use one of the extended GPRs R8 through R15 and
hence require a REX prefix, but having a REX prefix makes the high-byte
register AH unencodeable as the src operand. This latent bug was exposed
by this branch, presumably because `select` now happens to be putting
something in an extended GPR instead of a legacy GPR.
In theory this could be fixed with minimal cost by introducing a way to
communicate to `select` that neither the destination memory nor the
other temporary can be in an extended GPR. However, I just went for the
simple solution which comes at a cost of one trivial instruction: copy
the remainder from AH to AL, and *then* copy AL to the destination.
`rep movsb` isn't usually a great idea here. This commit makes the logic
which tentatively existed in `genInlineMemcpy` apply in more cases, and
in particular applies it to the "new" backend logic. Put simply, all
copies of 128 bytes or fewer will now attempt this path first,
where---provided there is an SSE register and/or a general-purpose
register available---we will lower the operation using a sequence of 32,
16, 8, 4, 2, and 1 byte copy operations.
The feedback I got on this diff was "Push it to master and if it
miscomps I'll revert it" so don't blame me when it explodes
