std.c.NI was never used in the source, so let's finally use it and make
the function more clear!
This is a breaking change, although a minor one: If you previously passed 0 here
(meaning no flags), then now you have to pass an empty struct (.{}) instead.
Otherwise, you probably used @bitCast() shenanigans here (like
@bitCast(c.NI { .NUMERICHOST = true }) and that will still work, but you can
also get rid of the @bitCast() now!
Zig's copy of the `SYMLINK_{NO,}FOLLOW` constants from wasi-musl was
wrong, as were the `IFIFO` and `IFSOCK` file type flags. Fix these up,
and add comments pointing to exactly where they come from (as the
wasi-musl source has lots of unused, different definitions of these
constants).
Add tests for the Zig convention that WASM preopen 3 is the current
working directory. This is true for WASM with or without libc.
Enable several fs and posix tests that are now passing (not necessarily
because of this change) on wasm targets.
Fixes#20890.
* fix merge conflicts
* rename the declarations
* reword documentation
* extract FixedBufferAllocator to separate file
* take advantage of locals
* remove the assertion about max alignment in Allocator API, leaving it
Allocator implementation defined
* fix non-inline function call in start logic
The GeneralPurposeAllocator implementation is totally broken because it
uses global state but I didn't address that in this commit.
heap.zig: define new default page sizes
heap.zig: add min/max_page_size and their options
lib/std/c: add miscellaneous declarations
heap.zig: add pageSize() and its options
switch to new page sizes, especially in GPA/stdlib
mem.zig: remove page_size
This was done by regex substitution with `sed`. I then manually went
over the entire diff and fixed any incorrect changes.
This diff also changes a lot of `callconv(.C)` to `callconv(.c)`, since
my regex happened to also trigger here. I opted to leave these changes
in, since they *are* a correct migration, even if they're not the one I
was trying to do!
This is necessary since isGnuLibC() is true for hurd, so we need to be able to
represent a glibc version for it.
Also add an Os.TaggedVersionRange.gnuLibCVersion() convenience function.
Abi.android on its own is not enough to know whether soft float or hard float
should be used. In the C world, androideabi is typically used for the soft float
case, so let's go with that.
Note that Android doesn't have a hard float ABI, so no androideabihf.
Closes#21488.
The signature is documented as:
int link(const char *, const char *);
(see https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/link.2.html or https://man.netbsd.org/link.2)
And its not some Linux extension, the [syscall
implementation](21b136cc63/fs/namei.c (L4794-L4797))
only expects two arguments too.
It probably *should* have a flags parameter, but its too late now.
I am a bit surprised that linking glibc or musl against code that invokes
a 'link' with three parameters doesn't fail (at least, I couldn't get any
local test cases to trigger a compile or link error).
The test case in std/posix/test.zig is currently disabled, but if I
manually enable it, it works with this change.
What is `sparcel`, you might ask? Good question!
If you take a peek in the SPARC v8 manual, §2.2, it is quite explicit that SPARC
v8 is a big-endian architecture. No little-endian or mixed-endian support to be
found here.
On the other hand, the SPARC v9 manual, in §3.2.1.2, states that it has support
for mixed-endian operation, with big-endian mode being the default.
Ok, so `sparcel` must just be referring to SPARC v9 running in little-endian
mode, surely?
Nope:
* 40b4fd7a3e/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/SparcTargetMachine.cpp (L226)
* 40b4fd7a3e/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/SparcTargetMachine.cpp (L104)
So, `sparcel` in LLVM is referring to some sort of fantastical little-endian
SPARC v8 architecture. I've scoured the internet and I can find absolutely no
evidence that such a thing exists or has ever existed. In fact, I can find no
evidence that a little-endian implementation of SPARC v9 ever existed, either.
Or any SPARC version, actually!
The support was added here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D8741
Notably, there is no mention whatsoever of what CPU this might be referring to,
and no justification given for the "but some are little" comment added in the
patch.
My best guess is that this might have been some private exercise in creating a
little-endian version of SPARC that never saw the light of day. Given that SPARC
v8 explicitly doesn't support little-endian operation (let alone little-endian
instruction encoding!), and no CPU is known to be implemented as such, I think
it's very reasonable for us to just remove this support.
