- factor out `loadReg`
- support all general system control registers in inline asm
- fix asserts after iterating field offsets
- fix typo in `slice_elem_val`
- fix translation of argument locations
The compiler actually doesn't need any functional changes for this: Sema
does reification based on the tag indices of `std.builtin.Type` already!
So, no zig1.wasm update is necessary.
This change is necessary to disallow name clashes between fields and
decls on a type, which is a prerequisite of #9938.
with this rewrite we can call functions inside of
inline assembly, enabling us to use the default start.zig logic
all that's left is to implement lr/sc loops for atomically manipulating
1 and 2 byte values, after which we can use the segfault handler logic.
I was doing duplicate work with `elemOffset` multiplying by the abi size and then the `ptr_add` `genBinOp` also multiplying.
This led to having writes happening in the wrong place.
Reorganize how the binOp and genBinOp functions work.
I've spent quite a while here reading exactly through the spec and so many
tests are enabled because of several critical issues the old design had.
There are some regressions that will take a long time to figure out individually
so I will ignore them for now, and pray they get fixed by themselves. When
we're closer to 100% passing is when I will start diving into them one-by-one.
- implements `airSlice`, `airBitAnd`, `airBitOr`, `airShr`.
- got a basic design going for the `airErrorName` but for some reason it simply returns
empty bytes. will investigate further.
- only generating `.got.zig` entries when not compiling an object or shared library
- reduced the total amount of ops a mnemonic can have to 3, simplifying the logic
This commit also performs some refactors to `TypedValue.print` in
preparation for improved comptime pointer access logic. Once that logic
exists, `TypedValue.print` can use Sema to access pointers for more
helpful printing.
This commit also implements proposal #19435, because the existing logic
there relied on some blatantly incorrect code in `Value.sliceLen`.
Resolves: #19435
As pointed out in the issue this behavior test branches on an undefined
value. That's not valid Zig code.
Also behavior tests should not depend on the standard library in this
manner. They need to minimally isolate the specific language thing that
is being tested.
Closes#12681
This reverts commit 0c99ba1eab63865592bb084feb271cd4e4b0357e, reversing
changes made to 5f92b070bf284f1493b1b5d433dd3adde2f46727.
This caused a CI failure when it landed in master branch due to a
128-bit `@byteSwap` in std.mem.
