* Fix compile error in Fuzzer web-ui
The error was:
```
error: expected type '?mem.Alignment', found 'comptime_int'
```
* Apply suggestions from code review
`.of` call is shorter and clearer
Co-authored-by: Alex Rønne Petersen <alex@alexrp.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Rønne Petersen <alex@alexrp.com>
Before:
❯ zig cc main.c -target x86_64-linux-musl && musl-ldd ./a.out
musl-ldd: ./a.out: Not a valid dynamic program
❯ zig cc main.c -target x86_64-linux-musl -static && musl-ldd ./a.out
musl-ldd: ./a.out: Not a valid dynamic program
❯ zig cc main.c -target x86_64-linux-musl -dynamic && musl-ldd ./a.out
musl-ldd: ./a.out: Not a valid dynamic program
After:
❯ zig cc main.c -target x86_64-linux-musl && musl-ldd ./a.out
musl-ldd: ./a.out: Not a valid dynamic program
❯ zig cc main.c -target x86_64-linux-musl -static && musl-ldd ./a.out
musl-ldd: ./a.out: Not a valid dynamic program
❯ zig cc main.c -target x86_64-linux-musl -dynamic && musl-ldd ./a.out
/lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 (0x72c10019e000)
libc.so => /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 (0x72c10019e000)
Closes#11909.
They are, themselves, static libraries even if the resulting artifact strictly
speaking requires dynamic linking to the corresponding system DLLs to run. Note,
though, that there's no libc-provided dynamic linker on Windows like on POSIX,
so this isn't particularly problematic.
This matches x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc behavior.
std.crypto: add constant-time codecs
Add constant-time hex/base64 codecs designed to process cryptographic
secrets, adapted from libsodium's implementations.
Introduce a `crypto.codecs` namespace for crypto-related encoders and
decoders. Move ASN.1 codecs to this namespace.
This will also naturally accommodate the proposed PEM codecs.
This lays the groundwork for #2879. This library will be built and linked when a
static libc is going to be linked into the compilation. Currently, that means
musl, wasi-libc, and MinGW-w64. As a demonstration, this commit removes the musl
C code for a few string functions and implements them in libzigc. This means
that those libzigc functions are now load-bearing for musl and wasi-libc.
Note that if a function has an implementation in compiler-rt already, libzigc
should not implement it. Instead, as we recently did for memcpy/memmove, we
should delete the libc copy and rely on the compiler-rt implementation.
I repurposed the existing "universal libc" code to do this. That code hadn't
seen development beyond basic string functions in years, and was only usable-ish
on freestanding. I think that if we want to seriously pursue the idea of Zig
providing a freestanding libc, we should do so only after defining clear goals
(and non-goals) for it. See also #22240 for a similar case.
