* riscv64: adjust alignment and size of 128-bit integers.
* take ofmt=c into account for ABI alignment of 128-bit integers and
structs.
* Type: make packed struct support intInfo
* fix f80 alignment for i386-windows-msvc
This makes `0123` and `u0123` etc. illegal.
I'm now confident that this is a good change because
I actually caught two C header translation mistakes in `haiku.zig` with this.
Clearly, `0123` being octal in C (TIL) can cause confusion, and we make this easier to read by
requiring `0o` as the prefix and now also disallowing leading zeroes in integers.
For consistency and because it looks weird, we disallow it for integer types too (e.g. `u0123`).
Fixes#11963Fixes#12417
files. Files generated from the standard library could be considered
for placing with main.js and index.html in lib/docs. Paths should
reflect packages in the future.
Make sure `ProcSym` includes a single element byte-array which delimits
the start of the symbol's name as part of its definition. This makes
the code more elegant in that accessing the name is equivalent to taking
the address of this one element array.
Before this commit, the modified test would fail with `FileNotFound` because the `entry.dir` would be for the entry itself rather than the containing dir of the entry. That is, if you were walking a tree of `a/b`, then (previously) the entry for `b` would incorrectly have an `entry.dir` for `b` rather than `a`.
`isAlNum` and `isAlpha`:
1. I think these names are a bit cryptic.
2. `isAlpha` is a bit ambiguous: is it alpha*numeric* or alpha*betic*?
This is why I renamed `isAlpha` to `isAlphabetic`.
3. For consistency and because `isAlNum` looks weird, I renamed it to `isAlphanumeric`.
`isCntrl`:
1. It's cryptic and hard to find when you look for it.
2. We don't save a lot of space writing it this way.
3. It's closer to the name of the `control_code` struct.
`isSpace`:
1. The name is ambiguous and misleading.
`spaces`:
1. Ditto
`isXDigit`:
1. The name is extremely cryptic.
2. The function is very hard to find by its name.
I think `isBlank` and `isWhitespace` are quite confusable.
What `isBlank` does is so simple that you can just do the `c == ' ' or c == '\t'`
check yourself but in a lot of cases you don't even want that.
`std.ascii` can't really know what you think "blank" means.
That's why I think it's better to remove it.
And again, it seems ambiguous considering that we have `isWhitespace`.
Next, it also deprecates `isGraph`.
It's the same as `isPrint(c) and c != ' '`, which I find confusing.
When something is printable, you can say it also has a *graph*ical representation.
Removing `isGraph` solves this possible confusion.
