From d3f3de73ba181c96008e7e98832764b23e637875 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Kelley Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 12:20:56 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Sema: less aggressive type resolution for field_val This is an alternate version of c675daac7d0d6328ad89297e8938a6b17b59c489 --- src/Sema.zig | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/Sema.zig b/src/Sema.zig index 850b050da4..7f6f47ef3e 100644 --- a/src/Sema.zig +++ b/src/Sema.zig @@ -26780,7 +26780,7 @@ fn structFieldVal( } try sema.requireRuntimeBlock(block, src, null); - try sema.queueFullTypeResolution(field_ty); + try sema.resolveTypeLayout(field_ty); return block.addStructFieldVal(struct_byval, field_index, field_ty); }, .anon_struct_type => |anon_struct| { @@ -26869,7 +26869,7 @@ fn tupleFieldValByIndex( } try sema.requireRuntimeBlock(block, src, null); - try sema.queueFullTypeResolution(field_ty); + try sema.resolveTypeLayout(field_ty); return block.addStructFieldVal(tuple_byval, field_index, field_ty); } @@ -27051,7 +27051,7 @@ fn unionFieldVal( _ = try block.addNoOp(.unreach); return .unreachable_value; } - try sema.queueFullTypeResolution(field_ty); + try sema.resolveTypeLayout(field_ty); return block.addStructFieldVal(union_byval, field_index, field_ty); } @@ -27347,7 +27347,7 @@ fn tupleField( try sema.validateRuntimeElemAccess(block, field_index_src, field_ty, tuple_ty, tuple_src); try sema.requireRuntimeBlock(block, tuple_src, null); - try sema.queueFullTypeResolution(field_ty); + try sema.resolveTypeLayout(field_ty); return block.addStructFieldVal(tuple, field_index, field_ty); }