From 2da2123128dfb78893109ad195fa536ff758f2ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Kelley <andrew@ziglang.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:37:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] parser: remove support for a recovery test case

I don't understand the idea here of this kind of recovery. If we
want to resurrect this test case we need some comments on it to explain
the purpose, example use cases, expected behavior, etc.
---
 lib/std/zig/parser_test.zig | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/std/zig/parser_test.zig b/lib/std/zig/parser_test.zig
index bc4fc797ef..d5dbd52190 100644
--- a/lib/std/zig/parser_test.zig
+++ b/lib/std/zig/parser_test.zig
@@ -4187,16 +4187,6 @@ test "recovery: invalid container members" {
     });
 }
 
-//test "recovery: invalid parameter" {
-//    try testError(
-//        \\fn main() void {
-//        \\    a(comptime T: type)
-//        \\}
-//    , &[_]Error{
-//        .expected_token,
-//    });
-//}
-
 //test "recovery: extra '}' at top level" {
 //    try testError(
 //        \\}}}